Skip to main content

Does Hong Kong Lack Chinese National Identity?

The youth of Hong Kong lack national identity and should be taught to feel Chinese, declared Chen Zuo'er, former deputy director of the State Council’s Hong Kong and Macao Affairs Office and current president of the Chinese Association of Hong Kong and Macao Studies.

"Hong Kong’s young students are intelligent and hard working. However, they lack a sense of national identity and of Chinese history," said Chen at a seminar held in Beijing on January 6. He argued that the participation of thousands of young students of Hong Kong in the recent Umbrella Revolution was a result of their lack of "national democratic [sic!] and civic awareness, life goals, and knowledge in geography, history and culture". He pointed out that Hong Kong's secretary for education is “under the supervision of the central government and Hong Kong society at all times”, according to articles 48 and 104 of the Basic Law.

He urged Hong Kong's educators to take into consideration the nation's "sovereignty, safety and interests", and teach their students a correct understanding of the Basic Law, of the "one country, two systems" model and of national identity. 

It is obvious that Chen Zuo'er and people like him don't understand that they are themselves the real problem. Their ideology is poisoning Hong Kong. Without Chen and his peers there would have been no Umbrella Revolution.  

People who have been reading this blog for some time might know by now how much I loathe nationalist doctrines. I have explained that nationalism is an incoherent and irrational ideology. I admit that national identity is a legitimate feeling of belonging to a group. But national identity - like religious, sexual or class identity - is a private matter and should never become state ideology. Whenever national, religious, sexual or class ideologies monopolise the state, the state inevitably becomes intolerant, autocratic and violent.

When Deng Xiaoping formulated his concept of "one country, two systems" he argued that mainland China would maintain its socialist system while Hong Kong would maintain its capitalist system and its way of life. But what was Hong Kong's way of life?

Under British rule Hong Kong wasn't a democracy, but an authoritarian colonial state whose governors were appointed by London. People's participation in politics was marginal and mostly confined to the economic and social elites. Beijing therefore argues that Hong Kong is more democratic now that it ever was in the colonial era. This is a partly true analysis, but it ignores the specific nature of the freedoms Hong Kong enjoyed under British rule.

The essence of Hong Kong under British rule was the absence of state-imposed ideology. The identity of the Hong Kong people wasn't the subject of education. The average Hongkonger was culturally Chinese, but he or she could absorb influences from all over the world, could participate in the global community on an equal footing, without hindrance, without inferiority complex, without dogmatic restraints. A Hongkonger was free to be anything he or she wanted, to define his or her own identity. This freedom was the best aspect of colonial Hong Kong.

After 1997, Beijing brought ideology into the lives of the Hong Kong people. Now the state says that each Hongkonger MUST develop a Chinese national consciousness as defined by the Chinese Communist Party. The Beijing leadership believes that "one country" means homogeneous, standardised, state-sanctioned national identity. Under British rule, the state never asked the Hong Kong people to feel British, English, Chinese, royalist, or anything else. While it is true that Hong Kong had no universal suffrage and no democratically elected government, the Hongkongers had freedom of speech, freedom to define their own identity, freedom to pursue their careers and live their lives the way they wanted. Beijing's nationalist ideology is depriving Hong Kong of these freedoms. Therefore, the CCP is destroying Hong Kong's way of life.

Chen Zuo'er is right. The Hong Kong people lack an exclusively Chinese national identity. A recent poll shows that 'Chinese identity' in Hong Kong is receding. A meagre 8.9% identified themselves as "Chinese". 26.8% of the respondents identified themselves as "Hongkongers", 42% as "Hongkongers but also Chinese" and 22.3% as "Chinese but also Hongkongers".

But why is this a problem? Why shouldn't Hongkongers after 1997 define their identity freely, like they did under British rule? Why is Beijing so eager to inculcate a dogmatic national identity into the young generation of Hongkongers?

The answer lies in the historical experience of China after its fateful and brutal encounter with the West in the 19th century. The CCP's obsession with national identity has become a fundamental part of Chinese nation-building efforts. In the next post, I will write about how nationalism emerged in China in the 19th and 20th century. In particular I will focus on the thought of Yan Fu, Zou Rong, Liang Qichao and Sun Yat-sen. These thinkers created the concept of nationalism as the most important precondition for China's salvation and anti-Western struggle. 


Popular posts from this blog

Will The Huawei Case Finally Awaken Democrats To The China Threat And The Danger Of Faux Free Trade Rhetoric?

On January 28 the Department of Justice of the United States unsealed two cases against Huawei, China's largest telecommunications company, and its chief financial officer, Meng Wanzhou. 
Huawei has been accused of trying to steal trade secrets, committing bank fraud, breaking confidentiality agreements and violating sanctions against Iran. One indictment claims that Huawei attempted to steal trade secrets from T-Mobile by promising bonuses to employees who collected confidential information.
Huawei is not a company like any other. Over the years it has benefited enormously from the support of the Chinese Communist regime. The founder of Huawei, Ren Zhengfei, joined China's army during the Cultural Revolution. In 1978 he also joined the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). 
In the early years Huawei's sources of capital were high-interest loans (20%-30%) from Chinese state-owned enterprises. Ren also secured soft loans from the local government of Shenzhen thanks to his personal co…

Chinese Dissident Zhang Jilin Detained By Police In Chongqing After Calling On Xi Jinping To Resign

Chinese dissident Zhang Jilin (张吉林) has been detained by police in the city of Chongqing after publicly saying that President Xi Jinping should be removed from office.
According to Taiwan-based Apple Daily, on January 17 Zhang talked about China's current affairs on a WeChat group. His ideas received praise from the group members, and he later told friends that he wanted to give a public speech based on the thoughts he had expressed online.
Other dissidents urged him to be careful, but he insisted that he had "the right to free speech." On January 19 Zhang went to Guanyinqiao Square, in the city of Chongqing, and delivered a speech about China's political situation, calling on Xi Jinping to be removed from office.
"I think it's time for Xi Jinping to be removed from office," Zhang told a crowd according to an audio recording. "The Chinese Communist Party will not do anything to the people. If you don't believe me, look, I have been giving a speech…

Quali sono i valori di sinistra? Alcune riflessioni

Mi capita a volte di avere dibattiti sui valori di sinistra con persone di diversi colori politici. Spesso, però, mi sembra che ci sia confusione sul loro significato. Ho dunque deciso di spiegare brevemente quali siano, secondo me, i valori di sinistra, e di delineare alcune politiche economiche per metterli in pratica.

1) democrazia parlamentare, diritti umani, separazione dei poteri, Stato di diritto;

2) progresso economico e sociale a beneficio della maggioranza dei cittadini, e non solo di una minoranza;

3) difesa del lavoro e della dignità dei lavoratori;

4) Stato sociale;

5) economia di mercato mista;

6) commercio equo.

Quali politiche secondo me dovrebbe sostenere la sinistra?

1) difesa dei diritti e del potere contrattuale dei lavoratori;

2) salario minimo;

3) mantenimento e, dove necessario, miglioramento del reddito di cittadinanza;

4) creazione di un sistema di gare pubbliche per imprenditori, e selezione tramite voto popolare di aziende da sovvenzionare con denaro pubblic…