Skip to main content

Hong Kong Police Told To Enforce "More Strictly" Public Order Ordinance Prohibiting "Unlawful Assembly"

As the 'South China Morning Post' reported today, the Hong Kong police will enforce laws governing public order "more strictly" and prevent gatherings of more than 3 people if they are deemed suspicious by police officers.

"If officers deem a gathering likely to cause any breach of the peace or threat to public safety, we would not allow the participants to proceed," a source was quoted as saying. "We would demand that they produce identification and disperse, and follow them around if they did not leave. Anyone who refuses to comply can be arrested for obstructing police."

The relevant laws prohibiting public gatherings are not a result of Hong Kong's 'mainlandisation', but date back to the British colonial era. In 1967 pro-Communist riots broke out in Hong Kong, and the British colonial government enacted the Public Order Ordinance, which controlled public meetings, processions, and assemblies (see: Wong Yiu-chung / Brian Bridges: One Country, Two Systems in Crisis: Hong Kong's Transformation since the Handover, 2008, p. 78; and Joseph Y. S. Cheng: The Other Hong Kong Report 1997, 1997, pp. 150-151). According to the Ordinance, every public meeting of three or more persons required prior approval by the Commissioner of Police.

source: Wikipedia

How the Public Order Ordinance was enforced is demonstrated by the following episode. In 1979 a group of 70 people who lived on boats in Yau Ma Tei Typhoon Shelter decided to petition the government and ask to be rehoused. They gathered in Kowloon and took two coaches heading for Government House. But the police stopped them at the cross-harbour tunnel before they could enter Hong Kong Island. The 70 people refused to disperse and were charged with "unlawful assembly". They were subsequently convicted by Hong Kong's Court of Appeal (Cheng 1997, p. 151). In theory, even a meeting of friends or family members discussing political matters could be considered "unlawful assembly" and lead to arrests.

The Ordinance was relaxed only in 1995, when the colonial administration under governor Chris Patten amended the law to bring it in line with the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). After the amendment, people organising public gatherings simply had to notify the police but needed no permission. 

After 1997, however, Beijing's National People's Congress (NPC) nullified the amendments and the pro-Communist Provisional Legislative Council enacted a new version of the Public Order Ordinance which was a compromise between the 1967 version and the liberal one of the Patten era. The current Public Order Ordinance requires organisers of public gatherings to notify the police. The Commissioner of Police then issues a 'notice of no objection' if no reason to prohibit the assembly is determined. The vague definition of "national security" contained in the Ordinance, however, gives the police broad discretion in judging the potential threat posed by a public gathering (see Ralf Horlemann: Hong Kong's Transition to Chinese Rule: The Limits of Autonomy, 2002, p. 32). 

After 1997 the Public Order Ordinance was not strictly enforced and meetings of more than three persons were generally tolerated. Last year's Occupy Central and the recent protests against mainland shoppers and parallel traders have led to a more rigid law-enforcement policy on the part of the authorities, which are eager to prevent new mass demonstrations. 

On March 8, demonstrations against parallel traders turned violent. A scene caught on camera and shared thousands of times on Facebook showed protesters shouting at a Cantonese-speaking woman. She opened her suitcase, which contained children's books, to prove she wasn't a parallel trader, yet the demonstrators continued to scream at her while her daughter cried loudly.

Since Beijing rejected pro-democratic groups' plead to allow genuine universal suffrage in Hong Kong, public assemblies are the only political means that citizens possess to put pressure on the executive branch of the Hong Kong government, which would result in a deeper crisis of legitimacy of the current political system.


Popular posts from this blog

Will The Huawei Case Finally Awaken Democrats To The China Threat And The Danger Of Faux Free Trade Rhetoric?

On January 28 the Department of Justice of the United States unsealed two cases against Huawei, China's largest telecommunications company, and its chief financial officer, Meng Wanzhou. 
Huawei has been accused of trying to steal trade secrets, committing bank fraud, breaking confidentiality agreements and violating sanctions against Iran. One indictment claims that Huawei attempted to steal trade secrets from T-Mobile by promising bonuses to employees who collected confidential information.
Huawei is not a company like any other. Over the years it has benefited enormously from the support of the Chinese Communist regime. The founder of Huawei, Ren Zhengfei, joined China's army during the Cultural Revolution. In 1978 he also joined the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). 
In the early years Huawei's sources of capital were high-interest loans (20%-30%) from Chinese state-owned enterprises. Ren also secured soft loans from the local government of Shenzhen thanks to his personal co…

Chinese Dissident Zhang Jilin Detained By Police In Chongqing After Calling On Xi Jinping To Resign

Chinese dissident Zhang Jilin (张吉林) has been detained by police in the city of Chongqing after publicly saying that President Xi Jinping should be removed from office.
According to Taiwan-based Apple Daily, on January 17 Zhang talked about China's current affairs on a WeChat group. His ideas received praise from the group members, and he later told friends that he wanted to give a public speech based on the thoughts he had expressed online.
Other dissidents urged him to be careful, but he insisted that he had "the right to free speech." On January 19 Zhang went to Guanyinqiao Square, in the city of Chongqing, and delivered a speech about China's political situation, calling on Xi Jinping to be removed from office.
"I think it's time for Xi Jinping to be removed from office," Zhang told a crowd according to an audio recording. "The Chinese Communist Party will not do anything to the people. If you don't believe me, look, I have been giving a speech…

Quali sono i valori di sinistra? Alcune riflessioni

Mi capita a volte di avere dibattiti sui valori di sinistra con persone di diversi colori politici. Spesso, però, mi sembra che ci sia confusione sul loro significato. Ho dunque deciso di spiegare brevemente quali siano, secondo me, i valori di sinistra, e di delineare alcune politiche economiche per metterli in pratica.

1) democrazia parlamentare, diritti umani, separazione dei poteri, Stato di diritto;

2) progresso economico e sociale a beneficio della maggioranza dei cittadini, e non solo di una minoranza;

3) difesa del lavoro e della dignità dei lavoratori;

4) Stato sociale;

5) economia di mercato mista;

6) commercio equo.

Quali politiche secondo me dovrebbe sostenere la sinistra?

1) difesa dei diritti e del potere contrattuale dei lavoratori;

2) salario minimo;

3) mantenimento e, dove necessario, miglioramento del reddito di cittadinanza;

4) creazione di un sistema di gare pubbliche per imprenditori, e selezione tramite voto popolare di aziende da sovvenzionare con denaro pubblic…