Skip to main content

Michael Avenatti Fails To Answer Simple Questions in Interview

Michael Avenatti, the California lawyer representing porn star Stormy Daniels, is considering running for president on the Democratic ticket in 2020. “I believe that the Democratic Party must be a party that fights fire with fire,” he told Iowa Democrats at a fundraising dinner on August 10. “When they go low, I say we hit harder." 

But does he have what it takes to defeat Trump and become the next Commander-in-Chief?

In an interview on "This Week" Sunday with ABC News Chief White House Correspondent Jonathan Karl, Avenatti was unable to answer simple questions regarding economic and foreign policy. 

"Would you repeal all of the Trump tax cuts?" Karl asked Avenatti.

"I haven't decided yet. I'm still analyzing the issue," he said. 

Embed from Getty Images

Karl then asked Avenatti what the biggest national security threat facing the United States right now is. 

"I think it would be the situation in the Middle East and -- well, I would say twofold. It's North Korea and Iran," Avenatti replied. He went on criticizing Donald Trump's foreign policy. "If you're going to go to Singapore and have a summit, you don't go there for a photo-op in front of some flags and a red carpet. You actually go there to get something done," he stated. 

On issues like trade Avenatti didn't seem to have a clear strategy, either. He said that he supports free trade and that he would "revive" but also "try to revise" the Trans-Pacific Parthership (TPP). In January 2017 Trump signed an executive order to withdraw from TPP. 

Avenatti agreed with the President that "there has been a number of trade deals that have been put in place over the years that have been one-sided", remarking that free trade must also be "fair". However, Avenatti did not elaborate on the details of his economic policy. 

Karl asked Avenatti how he would pay for Medicare for All. Avenatti said: "Well, I mean I’d think you start with not building the wall on the southern border. I think you also figure out how -- what you’re going to do relating to some of these tax breaks that were just given." 

When asked if Nancy Pelosi should become speaker of the House, Avenatti replied: "You know, I think that's a very tough decision. I think the House leadership is ultimately -- and the House of Reps is going to make that decision. I don't know yet."






Avenatti said that he should be taken seriously because he has "been fighting on behalf of Davids versus Goliaths, some of the largest corporations in the world, con men, fraudsters" for over 18 years, and that he has had "great success" as a lawyer. He added that he is a "student of the law" who is "very well-versed in a lot of issues that are at the forefront of our society right now" such as "environmental, issues, issues relating to the Supreme Court, issues relating to working people."

Karl remarked that when Trump ran for president, trade was the signature issue he had been talking for 30 years about. "What is the Avenatti policy issue that you’ve been talking about over the years," Karl asked. 

"The truth," Avenatti replied. "That is my policy. That is my policy issue, quote-unquote, is the truth. The facts and evidence. I deal and have dealt in 18 years with facts and evidence."  

Avenatti may be a good candidate, but he should be better prepared to answer simple questions and articulate his policy. Being tough or anti-Trump is not enough to win an election and lead a country for 4 years. Without a clear vision for the future of the US economy and society, without specific plans as to how to implement his policies and bring about the change a majority of the American people want, he does not deserve to be taken seriously.
  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Rumours About Chinese Actress Fan Bingbing's Arrest Spread Online

Rumours about the arrest of Chinese model and actress Fan Bingbing on charges of tax evasion have spread on Chinese media.
As Apple Daily reports, celebrity Fan Bingbing and her younger brother Fan Chengcheng have allegedly been detained for taking part in a tax evasion scheme alongside her manager, Mu Xiaoguang.
Mu has also allegedly been charged with destroying incriminating evidence.

On May 28 TV anchor Cui Yongyuan posted on Weibo a contract that showed Fan Bingbing being paid $1.56 million (RMB10 million) for four days’ work on director Feng Xiaogang's film “Cell Phone 2.” 

Later Cui released another contract worth $7.8 million (RMB50 million) for the same work. He alleged that Fan had declared to tax authorities only the first contract, thus avoiding to pay taxes on the second, larger amount. 

Double-contracts for the purpose of tax evasion are known in China as "yin-yang contracts". 

Although the Chinese government censored Cui's posts, in early June China's t…

Living in Taiwan: Seven Reasons Why It's Good to Be Here

Chinese New Year can be a pretty boring time for a foreigner. All of my friends were celebrating with their families, and since I have no family here, nor have I a girlfriend whose family I could join, I had nothing special to do. Shops and cafes were closed - apart from big chains like McDonald's or Starbucks, which were overcrowded anyway. So I had a lot of time to think.
On Saturday evening I went out to buy my dinner. While I was walking around, I heard the voices of the people inside their homes, the sounds of their New Year celebrations. Then I suddenly asked myself: "What on earth are you doing here? Why are you still in Taiwan?" 
Before I came to Taiwan, some Taiwanese friends of mine had recommended me their country, highly prasing it and going so far as to say that Taiwan is a "paradise for foreigners" (bear in mind that when I say foreigners I mean 'Westerners'). 
"It's easy for foreigners to find a job," they argued. "Taiwane…

Why Liberals Should Embrace Fair Trade, Debate Role Of Tariffs

On the latest episode of Last Week Tonight, comedian John Oliver made fun of Donald Trump's tariffs and mocked him for not understanding how free trade works.  
Oliver noted that tariffs are paid by importers and typically passed along to US consumers, leading to higher prices. Tariffs could cost the US hundreds of thousands of jobs, Oliver argued. 
Trade deficits "aren't actually always bad, and many economists believe, for very complex reasons involving savings rates and the dollar's special status as the world's reserve currency, that America's trade balance might be more or less where it should be," he said.
Oliver argued that "the overwhelming consensus among economists is that trade between countries generally speaking can create jobs, lower costs, and be a net benefit to both nations." 
But is John Oliver right?

We shall argue that although Trump's tariffs lack a clear strategy and are therefore not the right path for the US, tariffs…